Word analysis

Mark 8:32: ^CA jah swikunþaba þata waurd rodida; jah aftiuhands ina Paitrus dugann andbeitan ina;; — καὶ παρρησίᾳ τὸν λόγον ἐλάλει. καὶ προσλαβόμενος ὁ πέτρος αὐτὸν ἤρξατο ἐπιτιμᾶν αὐτῷ.; — Et palam verbum loquebatur. Et apprehendens eum Petrus, cœpit increpare eum.; — And he spake that saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.; — En dit woord sprak Hij vrij uit; en Petrus, Hem tot zich genomen hebbende, begon Hem te bestraffen;; — Il leur disait ces choses ouvertement. Et Pierre, l'ayant pris à part, se mit à le reprendre.

↑ Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indecl.)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: swikunþaba

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma swikunþs: Adjective (Adj.a)
WS 1910, p. 135: offenkundig, offenbar, bekannt
- Adverb

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: þata

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: Demonstrat. Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281¹), der, dieser — Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung. — Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).
- Neuter Nominative Singular
- Neuter Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: waurd

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma waurd: Noun, common, neuter (Na)
WS 1910, p. 170: Wort
- Nominative Singular
- Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: rodida

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma rodjan: Verb (sw.V.1-i)
WS 1910, p. 112: sprechen, reden nicht perfektivierbares Durativ, 297
- Past participle: Strong Feminine Nominative Singular
- Past participle: Strong Feminine Accusative Singular
- Past participle: Strong Neuter Nominative Plural
- Past participle: Strong Neuter Accusative Plural
- Past participle: Weak Masculine Nominative Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indecl.)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: aftiuhands

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma af-tiuhan: Verb (abl.V.2)
WS 1910, p. 140: wegziehn
- Present participle: Strong Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: ina

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: Anaphor. Pron. ‘er, der’
- Masculine Accusative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: Paitrus

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma Paitrus: Noun, proper (Noun)
WS 1910, p. 104: Πέτρος
- Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: dugann

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma du-ginnan: Verb (abl.V.3)
WS 1910, p. 50: beginnen — es dient zur Umschreibung des durativen Fut. L6,25 Ph1,18 (301a)
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: andbeitan

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma and-beitan: Verb (abl.V.1)
WS 1910, p. 18: m. Akk. schelten, bedrohen
- Infinitive

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: ina

Codex Argenteus, facs. 325 (fol. 52r)

Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: Anaphor. Pron. ‘er, der’
- Masculine Accusative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.