Word analysis

Mark 10:3
CA iþ is andhafjands qaþ: ƕa izwis anabauþ Moses?
— ὁ δὲ ἀποκριθεὶς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς, τί ὑμῖν ἐνετείλατο μωϋσῆς;
— At ille respondens, dixit eis : Quid vobis præcepit Moyses ?
— And he answered and said unto them, What did Moses command you?
— Maar Hij antwoordende, zeide tot hen: Wat heeft u Mozes geboden?
— Il leur répondit: Que vous a prescrit Moïse?

↑ Token: iþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: is

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: andhafjands

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: qaþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

  • Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
    WS 1910, p. 107: sagen perfektives Simplex, 296
    • Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
    • Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: ƕa

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

  • Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
    WS 1910, p. 62: substant. Frage-Pron. wer? 1. interrogativ — 2. indefinit (1731) irgend einer stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen — ƕo ƕeilo: eine Zeitlang
    • Neuter Nominative Singular
    • Neuter Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: izwis

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: anabauþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: Moses

Codex Argenteus, facs. 335 (fol. 38r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.