Word analysis

Mark 5:9
CA jah frah ina: ƕa namo þein? jah qaþ du imma: namo mein Laigaion, unte managai sijum.
— καὶ ἐπηρώτα αὐτόν, τί ὄνομά σοι; καὶ λέγει αὐτῷ, λεγιὼν ὄνομά μοι, ὅτι πολλοί ἐσμεν.
— Et interrogabat eum : Quod tibi nomen est ? Et dicit ei : Legio mihi nomen est, quia multi sumus.
— And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.
— En Hij vraagde hem: Welke is uw naam? En hij antwoordde, zeggende: Mijn naam is Legio; want wij zijn velen.
— Et, il lui demanda: Quel est ton nom? Légion est mon nom, lui répondit-il, car nous sommes plusieurs.

Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: frah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

  • Lemma fraihnan: Verb (irregular abl.V.5)
    WS 1910, p. 36: unreg.abl.V.5 fragen Die Sache, nach der man fragt, steht a) im Gen. (für gr. Akk.) b) m. bi m. Akk.
    • Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
    • Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: ina

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: ƕa

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

  • Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
    WS 1910, p. 62: substant. Frage-Pron. wer? 1. interrogativ — 2. indefinit (1731) irgend einer stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen — ƕo ƕeilo: eine Zeitlang
    • Neuter Nominative Singular
    • Neuter Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: namo

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: þein

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: qaþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

  • Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
    WS 1910, p. 107: sagen perfektives Simplex, 296
    • Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
    • Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: du

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, lexically ambiguous.

Token: imma

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: namo

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: mein

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: Laigaion

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: unte

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

  • Lemma unte: Conjunction (Indecl.)
    WS 1910, p. 160: I. temporal bis, so lange als — II. kausal, auf der Grenze zwischen Parataxe u. Hypotaxe stehend (340) denn, weil, da es nimmt stets den 1. Platz ein:

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: managai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: sijum

Codex Argenteus, facs. 301 (fol. 18r)

  • Lemma wisan: Verb (irregular abl.V.5)
    WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren nicht perfektivierbares Durativ
    • Active Indicative Present 1st Person Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.