Word analysis

Mark 8:21: ^CA jah qaþ du im: ƕaiwa ni nauh fraþjiþ?; — καὶ ἔλεγεν αὐτοῖς, οὔπω συνίετε;; — Et dicebat eis : Quomodo nondum intelligitis ?; — And he said unto them, How is it that ye do not understand?; — En Hij zeide tot hen: Hoe verstaat gij niet?; — Et il leur dit: Ne comprenez-vous pas encore?

↑ Token: jah

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Lemma du: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: προσελθοῦσα: "atgaggandei du" [L 8,44]; τοῖς προσφέρουσιν: "þaim bairandam du" [Mc 10,13].
Lemma du: Preposition, +D (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: 1. [räumlich] zu 2. [zeitlich] zu, für, in 3. [übertragen] 4. [Fälschlich steht du m. Akk. für bi m. Akk. C 4,10 AB 4,13 AB; vielleicht J 16,32.]
Lemma du: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: zu [beim Infinitiv]

Status: not verified, lexically ambiguous.

Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
- Neuter Dative Plural
- Feminine Dative Plural
- Masculine Dative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Lemma ƕaiwa: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 61: [Interr.] wie? [Indef.] irgendwie – "ei ƕaiwa": damit irgendwie, ob etwa; "ƕaiwa mais": wieviel mehr

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Lemma nauh: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 99: noch – [mit Negation:] noch nicht

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Lemma fraþjan: Verb (abl.V.6)
WS 1910, p. 38: 1. denken 2. erkennen, verstehn 3. verständig sein
- Active Indicative Present 3rd Person Singular
- Active Indicative Present 2nd Person Plural
- Active Imperative 2nd Person Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.