Word analysis
- Luke 10:26
- CA þaruh qaþ du imma: in witoda ƕa gameliþ ist? ƕaiwa ussiggwis?
- — ὁ δὲ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτόν, ἐν τῷ νόμῳ τί γέγραπται; πῶς ἀναγινώσκεις;
- — At ille dixit ad eum : In lege quid scriptum est ? quomodo legis ?
- — He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
- — En Hij zeide tot hem: Wat is in de wet geschreven? Hoe leest gij?
- — Jésus lui dit: Qu'est-il écrit dans la loi? Qu'y lis-tu?
↑ Token: þaruh
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma þaruh: Conjunction (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 145: nun; aber
Status: verified and/or disambiguated.
↑ Token: qaþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: du
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma du: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: προσελθοῦσα: "atgaggandei du" [L 8,44]; τοῖς προσφέρουσιν: "þaim bairandam du" [Mc 10,13]. - Lemma du: Preposition, +D (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: 1. [räumlich] zu 2. [zeitlich] zu, für, in 3. [übertragen] 4. [Fälschlich steht du m. Akk. für bi m. Akk. C 4,10 AB 4,13 AB; vielleicht J 16,32.] - Lemma du: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: zu [beim Infinitiv]
Status: not verified, lexically ambiguous.
↑ Token: imma
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: in
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma in: Preposition, +ADG (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 66: I. [m. Dativ] in, auf, an, unter [Ruhe] II. [m. Akkusativ] in, auf, nach, zu [Richtung] III. [m. Genitiv] wegen, um __ willen, für, durch
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: witoda
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma witoþ: Noun, common, neuter (Na)
WS 1910, p. 177: Gesetz
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: ƕa
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 62: wer? 1. [interrogativ] 2. [indefinit (173.1)] irgend einer [stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen] – "ƕo ƕeilo": eine Zeitlang
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: gameliþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma ga-meljan: Verb (sw.V.1-i)
WS 1910, p. 93: schreiben [perfektiv]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: ist
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma wisan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren [nicht perfektivierbares Durativ]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: ƕaiwa
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma ƕaiwa: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 61: [Interr.] wie? [Indef.] irgendwie – "ei ƕaiwa": damit irgendwie, ob etwa; "ƕaiwa mais": wieviel mehr
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: ussiggwis
Codex Argenteus, facs. 230 (fol. 165v)
- Lemma us-siggwan: Verb (abl.V.3)
WS 1910, p. 119: vorlesen, rezitieren [perfektiv]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.