Word analysis
- Luke 17:33
- CA saei sokeiþ saiwala seina ganasjan, fraqisteiþ izai, jah saei fraqisteiþ izai in meina, ganasjiþ þo.
- — ὃς ἐὰν ζητήσῃ τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ περιποιήσασθαι ἀπολέσει αὐτήν, ὃς δ' ἂν ἀπολέσῃ ζῳογονήσει αὐτήν.
- — Quicumque quæsierit animam suam salvam facere, perdet illam : et quicumque perdiderit illam, vivificabit eam.
- — Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it.
- — Zo wie zijn leven zal zoeken te behouden, die zal het verliezen; en zo wie hetzelve zal verliezen, die zal het in het leven behouden.
- — Celui qui cherchera à sauver sa vie la perdra, et celui qui la perdra la retrouvera.
↑ saei
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma saei : Pronoun, relative (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: der
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ sokeiþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma sakan : Verb (inflection: abl.V.6)
(more)
WS 1910: 1. streiten 2. [m. Dat.] Vorwürfe machen, schelten - Lemma sokjan : Verb (inflection: sw.V.1-i)
(more)
WS 1910: 1. suchen 2. disputieren
Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ saiwala
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma saiwala : Noun, common, feminine (inflection: Fo)
(more)
WS 1910: Seele
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ seina
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma Seina : Noun, proper (inflection: Noun) (more)
- Lemma sik : Pronoun, personal, reflexive (inflection: Pers.Pron)
(more)
WS 1910: sich [Gen. seina (Pl. L 7, 32), Dat. sis, für Sing. u. Plur. (164), nur auf das Subj. seines Satzes bezüglich (276). – reziprok: "sis misso"] - Lemma seins : Pronoun, possesive, reflexive (inflection: Adj.a)
(more)
WS 1910: sein, ihr [stets auf das Subjekt seines Satzes bezüglich, daher nur in den obliquen Kasus vorkommend (279.2)]
Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ fraqisteiþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma fra-qistjan : Verb (inflection: sw.V.1-i)
(more)
WS 1910: verderben, umbringen: 1. [m. Akk.] 2. [m. Dat.] 3. [zweifelhafter Kasus] 4. [absolut]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ izai
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma is : Pronoun, personal (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: ‘er, der’
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ jah
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma jah : Unassigned (inflection: Indeclinable)
(more)
WS 1910: und, und zwar, auch
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ saei
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma saei : Pronoun, relative (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: der
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ fraqisteiþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma fra-qistjan : Verb (inflection: sw.V.1-i)
(more)
WS 1910: verderben, umbringen: 1. [m. Akk.] 2. [m. Dat.] 3. [zweifelhafter Kasus] 4. [absolut]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ izai
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma is : Pronoun, personal (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: ‘er, der’
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ in
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma in : Preposition, +ADG (inflection: Indeclinable)
(more)
WS 1910: I. [m. Dativ] in, auf, an, unter [Ruhe] II. [m. Akkusativ] in, auf, nach, zu [Richtung] III. [m. Genitiv] wegen, um __ willen, für, durch
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ meina
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma ik : Pronoun, personal (inflection: Pers.Pron)
(more)
WS 1910: ich - Lemma meins : Pronoun, possesive (inflection: Adj.a)
(more)
WS 1910: mein
Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ ganasjiþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ þo
Codex Argenteus, facs. 252 (fol. 168v)
- Lemma sa : Pronoun, demonstrative (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.