Word analysis

Mark 6:16
CA gahausjands þan Herodes qaþ þatei þammei ik haubiþ afmaimait Iohanne, sa ist: sah urrais us dauþaim.
— ἀκούσας δὲ ὁ ἡρῴδης ἔλεγεν, ὃν ἐγὼ ἀπεκεφάλισα ἰωάννην, οὗτος ἠγέρθη.
— Quo audito Herodes ait : Quem ego decollavi Joannem, hic a mortuis resurrexit.
— But when Herod heard thereof, he said, It is John, whom I beheaded: he is risen from the dead.
— Maar als het Herodes hoorde, zeide hij: Deze is Johannes, dien ik onthoofd heb; die is van de doden opgewekt.
— Mais Hérode, en apprenant cela, disait: Ce Jean que j'ai fait décapiter, c'est lui qui est ressuscité.

Token: gahausjands

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

  • Lemma ga-hausjan: Verb (sw.V.1-i)
    WS 1910, p. 56: hören, vernehmen (perfektiv): fast durchweg ἀκοῦσαι (zu den Ausnahmen vgl. PBB. 15,158.164f.) — Ingressiv: das Gehör bekommen
    • Present participle: Strong Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: þan

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, lexically ambiguous.

Token: Herodes

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: qaþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

  • Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
    WS 1910, p. 107: sagen perfektives Simplex, 296
    • Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
    • Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: þatei

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: þammei

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: ik

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: haubiþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: afmaimait

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: Iohanne

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: sa

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

  • Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
    WS 1910, p. 112: Demonstrat. Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (2811), der, dieser — Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung. — Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).
    • Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: ist

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

  • Lemma wisan: Verb (irregular abl.V.5)
    WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren nicht perfektivierbares Durativ
    • Active Indicative Present 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: sah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

  • Lemma sah: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
    WS 1910, p. 113: Demonstr. betont die materielle Übereinstimmung mit dem Bezugswort: der u. kein andrer, eben der — — In einer dem Relativ verwandten Funktion, als Vertreter des griech. ὅς (343)
    • Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: urrais

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

  • Lemma ur-reisan: Verb (abl.V.1)
    WS 1910, p. 111: erstehn, sich erheben (perfektiv)
    • Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
    • Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: us

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: dauþaim

Codex Argenteus, facs. 310 (fol. 22v)

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.