Word analysis
- Mark 9:32
- CA iþ eis ni froþun þamma waurda jah ohtedun ina fraihnan.
- — οἱ δὲ ἠγνόουν τὸ ῥῆμα, καὶ ἐφοβοῦντο αὐτὸν ἐπερωτῆσαι.
- — At illi ignorabant verbum : et timebant interrogare eum.
- — But they understood not that saying, and were afraid to ask him.
- — Maar zij verstonden dat woord niet, en zij vreesden Hem te vragen.
- — Mais les disciples ne comprenaient pas cette parole, et ils craignaient de l'interroger.
↑ CA.1 iþ
- Lemma iþ : Conjunction (inflection: Indeclinable)
(more)
WS 1910: 1. [Konj., stets an der Spitze des Satzes (334)] aber 2. [Zur einleitung konjunktionsloser Bedingungssätze (370a)]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ CA.2 eis
- Lemma is : Pronoun, personal (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: ‘er, der’
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ CA.3 ni
- Lemma ni : Unassigned (inflection: Indeclinable)
(more)
WS 1910: nicht
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ CA.4 froþun
- Lemma fraþjan : Verb (inflection: abl.V.6)
(more)
WS 1910: 1. denken 2. erkennen, verstehn 3. verständig sein
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ CA.5 þamma
- Lemma sa : Pronoun, demonstrative (inflection: Pron.)
(more)
WS 1910: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ CA.6 waurda
- Lemma waurd : Noun, common, neuter (inflection: Na)
(more)
WS 1910: Wort
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ CA.7 jah
- Lemma jah : Unassigned (inflection: Indeclinable)
(more)
WS 1910: und, und zwar, auch
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ CA.8 ohtedun
- Lemma *ogan : Verb (inflection: V.prt.-prs.)
(more)
WS 1910: 1. etw. fürchten φοβεῖσθαι 2. [dativ. Reflexiv (255)] "ogan sis" sich fürchten vor [Akk.]
Status: verified and/or disambiguated.