Word analysis

Luke 4:34: ^CA qiþands: let! ƕa uns jah þus, Iesu Nazorenu? qamt fraqistjan unsis? kann þuk, ƕas is, sa weiha gudis.; — ἔα, τί ἡμῖν καὶ σοί, ἰησοῦ ναζαρηνέ; ἦλθες ἀπολέσαι ἡμᾶς; οἶδά σε τίς εἶ, ὁ ἅγιος τοῦ θεοῦ.; — dicens : Sine, quid nobis et tibi, Jesu Nazarene ? venisti perdere nos ? scio te quis sis, Sanctus Dei.; — Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art; the Holy One of God.; — Zeggende: Laat af, wat hebben wij met U te doen, Gij Jezus Nazarener? Zijt Gij gekomen, om ons te verderven? Ik ken U, wie Gij zijt, namelijk de Heilige Gods.; — Ah! qu'y a-t-il entre nous et toi, Jésus de Nazareth? Tu es venu pour nous perdre. Je sais qui tu es: le Saint de Dieu.

↑ Token: qiþands

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
- Present participle: Strong Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: let

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma letan: Verb (red.-abl.V.)
WS 1910, p. 84: lassen
- Active Imperative 2nd Person Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: ƕa

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 62: wer? 1. [interrogativ] 2. [indefinit (173.1)] irgend einer [stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen] – "ƕo ƕeilo": eine Zeitlang
- Neuter Nominative Singular
- Neuter Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: uns

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma ik: Pronoun, personal (Pers.Pron)
WS 1910, p. 66: ich
- Accusative Plural
- Dative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: þus

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma þu: Pronoun, personal (Pers.Pron)
WS 1910, p. 151: du
- Dative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: Iesu

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma Iesus: Noun, proper (Noun)
WS 1910, p. 66: [Als Name Christi stets abgekürzt: N. is; A. iu; G. iuis; D. iua u. iu L 3,21 Mc 10,50 E 4,21 AB; VB. iu M 8,29 L 4,34 8,28 17,13 18,38 Mc. 1,24 5,7 10,47; als profaner Name ausgeschrieben N. C 4,11 AB]
- Vocative Singular
- Accusative Singular
- Dative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: Nazorenu

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma *Nazorenus: Noun, proper (Noun)
WS 1910, p. 99: Nazoräer, Nazarener
- Vocative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: qamt

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma qiman: Verb (abl.V.4)
WS 1910, p. 106: kommen [perfektives Simplex]
- Active Indicative Preterite 2nd Person Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: fraqistjan

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma fra-qistjan: Verb (sw.V.1-i)
WS 1910, p. 107: verderben, umbringen: 1. [m. Akk.] 2. [m. Dat.] 3. [zweifelhafter Kasus] 4. [absolut]
- Infinitive

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: unsis

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma ik: Pronoun, personal (Pers.Pron)
WS 1910, p. 66: ich
- Dative Plural
- Accusative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: kann

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma kunnan: Verb (V.prt.-prs.)
WS 1910, p. 76: kennen, wissen
- Active Indicative Present 3rd Person Singular
- Active Indicative Present 1st Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: þuk

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma þu: Pronoun, personal (Pers.Pron)
WS 1910, p. 151: du
- Accusative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: ƕas

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 62: wer? 1. [interrogativ] 2. [indefinit (173.1)] irgend einer [stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen] – "ƕo ƕeilo": eine Zeitlang
- Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: is

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
- Neuter Genitive Singular
- Masculine Nominative Singular
- Masculine Genitive Singular
Lemma wisan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren [nicht perfektivierbares Durativ]
- Active Indicative Present 2nd Person Singular

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: sa

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
- Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: weiha

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma weiha: Noun, common, masculine (Mn)
WS 1910, p. 172: Priester
- Nominative Singular
Lemma weihan: Verb (abl.V.1)
WS 1910, p. 172: kämpfen
- Active Indicative Present 1st Person Singular
Lemma weihan: Verb (sw.V.3)
WS 1910, p. 172: weihen, heiligen
- Active Indicative Present 1st Person Singular
Lemma weihs: Adjective (Adj.a)
WS 1910, p. 172: heilig
- Strong Neuter Accusative Plural
- Strong Feminine Accusative Singular
- Strong Feminine Nominative Singular
- Weak Masculine Nominative Singular
- Strong Neuter Nominative Plural

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: gudis

Codex Argenteus, facs. 170 (fol. 135v)

Lemma guþ: Noun, common, masculine (Noun)
WS 1910, p. 51: Gott [sehr häufig]; [fast durchweg abgekürzt geschrieben: N. "gþ" G. "gþs" D. "gþa"; ausgeschrieben nur N.A.Pl. "guda" J 10,34.35, wo es im übertragenen Sinn gebraucht wird (dagegen regelrecht "ni sind gþa" G 4,8).]
- Genitive Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.