Word analysis

Mark 3:33: ^CA jah andhof im qiþands: ƕo ist so aiþei meina aiþþau þai broþrjus meinai?; — καὶ ἀποκριθεὶς αὐτοῖς λέγει, τίς ἐστιν ἡ μήτηρ μου καὶ οἱ ἀδελφοί [μου];; — Et respondens eis, ait : Quæ est mater mea et fratres mei ?; — And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?; — En Hij antwoordde hun, zeggende: Wie is Mijn moeder, of Mijn broeders?; — Et il répondit: Qui est ma mère, et qui sont mes frères?

↑ Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indecl.)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: andhof

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma and-hafjan: Verb (irregular abl.V.6)
WS 1910, p. 52: [unreg.abl.V.6] erwidern, antworten
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: im

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: Anaphor. Pron. ‘er, der’
- Masculine Dative Plural
- Feminine Dative Plural
- Neuter Dative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: qiþands

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen perfektives Simplex, 296
- Present participle: Strong Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: ƕo

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 62: substant. Frage-Pron. wer? 1. interrogativ — 2. indefinit (173¹) irgend einer stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen — ƕo ƕeilo: eine Zeitlang
- Feminine Nominative Singular
- Feminine Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: ist

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma wisan: Verb (irregular abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren nicht perfektivierbares Durativ
- Active Indicative Present 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: so

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: Demonstrat. Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281¹), der, dieser — Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung. — Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).
- Feminine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: aiþei

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma aiþei: Noun, common, feminine (Fn)
WS 1910, p. 5: Mutter
- Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: meina

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma ik: Pronoun, personal (Pers.Pron)
WS 1910, p. 66: ich
- Genitive Singular
Lemma meins: Pronoun, possessive (Adj.a)
WS 1910, p. 93: Poss. mein
- Strong Feminine Nominative Singular
- Strong Feminine Accusative Singular
- Strong Neuter Nominative Plural
- Strong Neuter Accusative Plural

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: aiþþau

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma aiþþau: Conjunction (Indecl.)
WS 1910, p. 5: 1. oder; jabai __ aiþþau u. andizuh __ aiþþau: entweder __ oder — 2. wo nicht, sonst — 3. Es leitet den Nachsatz einer irrealen hypothet. Periode ein (367,3)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: þai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: Demonstrat. Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281¹), der, dieser — Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung. — Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).
- Masculine Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: broþrjus

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma broþar: Noun, common, masculine (Mr)
WS 1910, p. 23: Bruder
- Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: meinai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)

Lemma meins: Pronoun, possessive (Adj.a)
WS 1910, p. 93: Poss. mein
- Strong Masculine Nominative Plural
- Strong Feminine Dative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.