Word analysis
- Mark 3:33
- CA jah andhof im qiþands: ƕo ist so aiþei meina aiþþau þai broþrjus meinai?
- — καὶ ἀποκριθεὶς αὐτοῖς λέγει, τίς ἐστιν ἡ μήτηρ μου καὶ οἱ ἀδελφοί [μου];
- — Et respondens eis, ait : Quæ est mater mea et fratres mei ?
- — And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?
- — En Hij antwoordde hun, zeggende: Wie is Mijn moeder, of Mijn broeders?
- — Et il répondit: Qui est ma mère, et qui sont mes frères?
↑ Token: jah
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: andhof
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma and-hafjan: Verb (abl.V.6)
WS 1910, p. 52: erwidern, antworten
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: im
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: qiþands
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: ƕo
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 62: wer? 1. [interrogativ] 2. [indefinit (173.1)] irgend einer [stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen] – "ƕo ƕeilo": eine Zeitlang
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: ist
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma wisan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren [nicht perfektivierbares Durativ]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: so
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: aiþei
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma aiþei: Noun, common, feminine (Fn)
WS 1910, p. 5: Mutter
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: meina
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma ik: Pronoun, personal (Pers.Pron)
WS 1910, p. 66: ich - Lemma meins: Pronoun, possesive (Adj.a)
WS 1910, p. 93: mein
Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: aiþþau
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma aiþþau: Conjunction (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 5: 1. oder; "jabai __ aiþþau" u. "andizuh __ aiþþau": entweder __ oder 2. wo nicht, sonst 3. [Es leitet den Nachsatz einer irrealen hypothet. Periode ein (367,3)]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: þai
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: broþrjus
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma broþar: Noun, common, masculine (Mr)
WS 1910, p. 23: Bruder
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: meinai
Codex Argenteus, facs. 293 (fol. 29r)
- Lemma meins: Pronoun, possesive (Adj.a)
WS 1910, p. 93: mein
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.