Word analysis

Mark 9:11: ^CA jah frehun ina qiþandans: unte qiþand þai bokarjos þatei Helias skuli qiman faurþis?; — καὶ ἐπηρώτων αὐτὸν λέγοντες, ὅτι λέγουσιν οἱ γραμματεῖς ὅτι ἠλίαν δεῖ ἐλθεῖν πρῶτον;; — Et interrogabant eum, dicentes : Quid ergo dicunt pharisæi et scribæ, quia Eliam oportet venire primum ?; — And they asked him, saying, Why say the scribes that Elias must first come?; — En zij vraagden Hem, zeggende: Waarom zeggen de Schriftgeleerden, dat Elias eerst komen moet?; — Les disciples lui firent cette question: Pourquoi les scribes disent-ils qu'il faut qu'Élie vienne premièrement?

↑ Token: jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: frehun

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma fraihnan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 36: fragen [Die Sache, nach der man fragt, steht a) im Gen. (für gr. Akk.) b) m. "bi" m. Akk.]
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: ina

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
- Masculine Accusative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: qiþandans

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
- Present participle: Weak Masculine Nominative Plural
- Present participle: Weak Masculine Accusative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: unte

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma unte: Conjunction (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 160: I. [temporal] bis, so lange als II. [kausal, auf der Grenze zwischen Parataxe u. Hypotaxe stehend (340)] denn, weil, da [es nimmt stets den 1. Platz ein:]

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: qiþand

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
- Active Indicative Present 3rd Person Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: þai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma sa: Pronoun, demonstrative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 112: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
- Masculine Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: bokarjos

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma bokareis: Noun, common, masculine (Mia)
WS 1910, p. 22: Schriftgelehrter; Schreiber [Neap. Urk.]
- Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: þatei

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma saei: Pronoun, relative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 113: der
- Neuter Nominative Singular
- Neuter Accusative Singular
Lemma þatei: Conjunction (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 145: daß; "ni þatei": nicht daß, nicht als ob

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ Token: Helias

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma Helias: Noun, proper (Noun)
WS 1910, p. 57
- Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: skuli

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma skulan: Verb (V.prt.-prs.)
WS 1910, p. 124: schuldig sein, sollen
- Active Optative Present 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: qiman

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma qiman: Verb (abl.V.4)
WS 1910, p. 106: kommen [perfektives Simplex]
- Infinitive

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ Token: faurþis

Codex Argenteus, facs. 328 (fol. 53v)

Lemma faurþis: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 34: zuvor, früher

Status: not verified but unambiguous.