Word analysis
- Luke 9:55
- CA gawandjands þan gasok im jah qaþ du im: niu wituþ ƕis ahmane sijuþ?
- — στραφεὶς δὲ ἐπετίμησεν αὐτοῖς.
- — Et conversus increpavit illos, dicens : Nescitis cujus spiritus estis.
- — But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
- — Maar Zich omkerende, bestrafte Hij hen, en zeide: Gij weet niet van hoedanigen geest gij zijt.
- — Jésus se tourna vers eux, et les réprimanda, disant: Vous ne savez de quel esprit vous êtes animés.
↑ Token: gawandjands
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma ga-wandjan: Verb (sw.V.1-i)
WS 1910, p. 169: (hin)wenden [perfektiv]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: þan
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma þan: Conjunction (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 144: δέ [(ungemein häufig)]; [sehr oft zugleich mit -uh]
Status: verified and/or disambiguated.
↑ Token: gasok
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma ga-sakan: Verb (abl.V.6)
WS 1910, p. 115: [m. Dat.] schelten [perfektiv]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: im
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
Status: verified and/or disambiguated.
↑ Token: jah
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma jah: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 71: und, und zwar, auch
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: qaþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma qiþan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 107: sagen [perfektives Simplex, 296]
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: du
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma du: Adverb (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: προσελθοῦσα: "atgaggandei du" [L 8,44]; τοῖς προσφέρουσιν: "þaim bairandam du" [Mc 10,13]. - Lemma du: Preposition, +D (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: 1. [räumlich] zu 2. [zeitlich] zu, für, in 3. [übertragen] 4. [Fälschlich steht du m. Akk. für bi m. Akk. C 4,10 AB 4,13 AB; vielleicht J 16,32.] - Lemma du: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 28: zu [beim Infinitiv]
Status: not verified, lexically ambiguous.
↑ Token: im
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma is: Pronoun, personal (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 69: ‘er, der’
Status: verified and/or disambiguated.
↑ Token: niu
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma niu: Unassigned (Indeclinable)
WS 1910, p. 102: [d.i. ni + Fragepart. -u, stets an der Spitze des Satzes, eine bejahende Antwort erwartend:] nicht? nicht wahr?
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: wituþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma witan: Verb (V.prt.-prs.)
WS 1910, p. 177: wissen
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: ƕis
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
WS 1910, p. 62: wer? 1. [interrogativ] 2. [indefinit (173.1)] irgend einer [stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen] – "ƕo ƕeilo": eine Zeitlang
Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.
↑ Token: ahmane
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma ahma: Noun, common, masculine (Mn)
WS 1910, p. 3: Geist
Status: not verified but unambiguous.
↑ Token: sijuþ
Codex Argenteus, facs. 223 (fol. 162r)
- Lemma wisan: Verb (abl.V.5)
WS 1910, p. 175: sein, dasein, existieren [nicht perfektivierbares Durativ]
Status: not verified but unambiguous.