Word analysis

Corinthians I 7:16
A ƕa nuk~kannt þu, qino[n], ei aban ganasjais? aiþþau ƕa kannt, guma, þatei qen þeina ganasjais?
— τί γὰρ οἶδας, γύναι, εἰ τὸν ἄνδρα σώσεις; ἢ τί οἶδας, ἄνερ, εἰ τὴν γυναῖκα σώσεις;
— Unde enim scis mulier, si virum salvum facies ? aut unde scis vir, si mulierem salvam facies ?
— For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?
— Want wat weet gij, vrouw, of gij den man zult zalig maken? Of wat weet gij, man, of gij de vrouw zult zalig maken?
— Car que sais-tu, femme, si tu sauveras ton mari? Ou que sais-tu, mari, si tu sauveras ta femme?

Token: ƕa

Codex Ambrosianus A

  • Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
    WS 1910, p. 62: substant. Frage-Pron. wer? 1. interrogativ — 2. indefinit (1731) irgend einer stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen — ƕo ƕeilo: eine Zeitlang
    • Neuter Nominative Singular
    • Neuter Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: nuk~kannt

Codex Ambrosianus A

Compound token: enclisis & assimilation.

1nuk~ + 2kannt

This token was not recognized automatically.

Token: þu

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: qino

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: ei

Codex Ambrosianus A

  • Lemma ei: Conjunction (Indecl.)
    WS 1910, p. 29: C. Konjunktion damit, daß (353ff.): I. in Absichtssätzen stets m. Opt. — II. in Zwecksätzen, ebenf. m. Opt. — III. in Explikativsätzen — IV. Wo ei dem gr. εἰ entspricht, handelt es sich um eine Konstruktionsverschiebung — V. ei vor direkter Rede wie gr. ὅτι ist Gräzismus J 18,9

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: aban

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: ganasjais

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: aiþþau

Codex Ambrosianus A

  • Lemma aiþþau: Conjunction (Indecl.)
    WS 1910, p. 5: 1. oder; jabai __ aiþþau u. andizuh __ aiþþau: entweder __ oder — 2. wo nicht, sonst — 3. Es leitet den Nachsatz einer irrealen hypothet. Periode ein (367,3)

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: ƕa

Codex Ambrosianus A

  • Lemma ƕas: Pronoun, interrogative (Pron.)
    WS 1910, p. 62: substant. Frage-Pron. wer? 1. interrogativ — 2. indefinit (1731) irgend einer stets affirmativ, auch in negativen Sätzen — ƕo ƕeilo: eine Zeitlang
    • Neuter Nominative Singular
    • Neuter Accusative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: kannt

Codex Ambrosianus A

This token was not recognized automatically. It is probably a number, abbreviation or spelling variant.

Token: guma

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: þatei

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: qen

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

Token: þeina

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

Token: ganasjais

Codex Ambrosianus A

Status: not verified but unambiguous.